Nevada vs New Hampshire
A tax calculator says the difference is $5,889 a year. Once you count what a dollar actually buys in each, Nevada is $8,761 ahead — $87,615 over 10 years.
Property tax is set by counties, not states. Inside Texas alone the rate varies six times over, so this is the single choice that changes the answer most.
Does it work everywhere in New Hampshire?
in what the money buys · $87,615 over 10 years
You need 13.0% more for the move to break even.
Who worked this out, and what it is built on
I build and maintain every comparison on this site — 1275 state pairs so far, on the same engine that runs the tax calculators for all 50 states and 3,143 counties. This is not a template with two names swapped into it: Nevada and New Hampshire are run through the actual rules of each place, and if the numbers say the move is not worth it, that is what the page says.
Four sources, and one deliberate refusal. Federal figures from the IRS revenue procedure. State rates read one state at a time off each state’s own department of revenue. County property tax from the US Census Bureau. Cost of living from the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities, 2024 — and not from Numbeo or any other crowd-sourced index, because those are filled in by users, publish no methodology, and cannot be cited. That single choice is most of why the cost-of-living numbers here differ from everybody else’s.
When I get something wrong I publish the correction with the date and what it cost — including the two mistakes on these pages I found myself. Data last verified September 1, 2026.
Where to go from here
Almost nobody is choosing between exactly two places. These are the questions that usually come next, with the answer already attached so you can see which is worth opening.
Other moves involving Nevada or New Hampshire
States that sit near New Hampshire on prices compared against Nevada, and the mirror of that. The comparison you would run next.
- Connecticut vs Nevada— Nevada by $11,457
- Florida vs Nevada— Nevada by $3,424
- Maryland vs Nevada— Nevada by $12,353
- Illinois vs New Hampshire— New Hampshire by $1,399
- Delaware vs New Hampshire— Delaware by $3,846
- Arizona vs New Hampshire— Arizona by $6,115
Each state on its own
The full detail behind each half of the comparison above.
The counties that decide it
Property tax is set by county, and the spread inside one state beats most state pairs.
- Storey County, Nevada— 0.40%, the cheapest
- Mineral County, Nevada— 0.70%, the dearest
- Carroll County, New Hampshire— 1.06%, the cheapest
- Sullivan County, New Hampshire— 2.38%, the dearest
Similar in price to Nevada
States that sit next to Nevada on the price index — often the comparison people should have run.
- Virginia— 101.1 on prices
- Arizona— 100.7 on prices
- Illinois— 100 on prices
- Delaware— 99.8 on prices
- Every Nevada comparison— all 50
- Every New Hampshire comparison— all 50
- The nine states with no income tax— and what they charge instead
Nevada leaves you $8,761 a year better off — not the number you were expecting
On $100,000 with a $400,000 home, the take-home difference between Nevada and New Hampshire is $5,889 a year. That is what a tax calculator gives you, and it is a nominal figure: it treats a dollar in Nevada and a dollar in New Hampshire as the same thing.
They are not. On the Bureau of Economic Analysis price index Nevada is 100 and New Hampshire is 104.2, where 100 is the national average. Deflate each take-home by where it gets spent and what the money actually buys is $77,149 in Nevada against $68,387 in New Hampshire — a real difference of $8,761 a year, 1.5× the nominal one, and $87,615 over the 10 years most people stay.
Where the two sit nationally: New Hampshire is the 9th most expensive place to live of the 51 — the 50 states and the District of Columbia — and Nevada is 19th. Housing, the component that moves most, is 114.1 against 114.9.
Grey columns are what a year of Nevada and a year of New Hampshire are worth in the same money. The bars between them are each thing that changes, in the order it changes: green adds, amber takes away.
Neither Nevada nor New Hampshire taxes income, so nothing here is about income tax
Both of these states levy no state income tax at all, which removes the layer that almost every comparison of two states is built on. The federal bill is $13,170 and FICA $7,650, identical in both because both are federal. State income tax is zero on both sides.
So what is left is the part usually treated as a footnote. Property tax: $2,031 in Nevada against $7,920 in New Hampshire on a $400,000 home, at each state's median local rate — a difference of $5,889 a year, and on this pair it is the entire tax story.
And the price level, which is the larger half: 100 against 104.2. Between two states with no income tax, the choice is decided almost entirely by property tax and prices — which is a useful thing to know before choosing between them on the strength of a headline they share.
Where the money actually goes, line by line
Five separate taxes, and on this pair property tax is the biggest single difference — $5,889 against $0 for the income tax everybody quotes:
Federal income tax — $13,170 either way. Identical, because it is federal. Any comparison that shows a difference here is wrong.
FICA — $7,650 either way. Also federal, also identical.
State income tax — $0 in Nevada, $0 in New Hampshire. Nevada does not levy one at all, which is the fact that sells the move — and, as the next line shows, not the fact that decides it.
Property tax — $2,031 in Nevada, $7,920 in New Hampshire on a $400,000 home, at each state's median local rate. This is bigger than the income tax difference, and it runs the other way — which is the whole reason the headline number disappoints.
Local income tax — zero on both sides. Nevada has none at any level, state or local — and that holds for all nine states without a state income tax, none of which lets a county or city levy one either. The two go together.
Total: $22,851 in Nevada against $28,740 in New Hampshire — 22.9% and 28.7% of gross.
And New Hampshire housing costs 0.7% more
Comparison sites use a single crowd-sourced cost-of-living figure. This is the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parity, official and broken into components — and on this pair the components tell a stranger story than the headline, starting with utilities.
Cheaper in New Hampshire than NevadaDearer in New Hampshire than Nevada
Each bar is how far apart Nevada and New Hampshire are on that component, and which way. Housing almost always runs several times wider than everything else — which is why a single blended index tells you very little.
All items — 100 in Nevada, 104.2 in New Hampshire. A gap of 4.2 points.
Housing — 114.1 against 114.9. A gap of 0.8 points, 0.2× the headline gap. This is what people mean when they say somewhere is expensive.
Goods — 96.3 against 98.6, 2.3 points apart — wide for goods: across all 1,275 state pairs the median goods gap is 2.7 points against 24.9 for housing, so on this pair the shopping basket genuinely differs and not just the rent.
Utilities — 90.5 against 133.7. 43.2 points, the second widest component after housing on this pair, and large enough to matter to anyone heating or cooling a big house.
Which half of this reaches you depends on whether you buy. Renting, the real difference between Nevada and New Hampshire is $3,192 a year — property tax comes out of your side entirely, and what is left is the price level. Buying a $400,000 home it is $8,761. So buying widens the gap by $5,570: the more house you own, the more this comparison is worth to you.
The number to take into a salary negotiation: $112,977
This is the question people are actually asking and almost nobody answers: what would I need to earn in New Hampshire to live exactly as well as I do on $100,000 in Nevada?
$112,977. That is 13.0% more than you earn now. Anything less than $112,977 and the move costs you money however it is presented.
The dashed line is the salary you earn now. The solid line is what matches it in New Hampshire. If the relationship were a simple multiplier the two would be parallel — they are not, because brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that does not move with income all bend it.
The obvious shortcut fails here, and by a measurable amount. Scaling your salary by the ratio of price levels — $100,000 × 104.2/100 — gives $104,200. The answer is $112,977, so the shortcut is $8,777 too low: brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that ignores income all bend the line the shortcut assumes is straight.
The figure belongs to the two states and your income. On $40,000 the match in New Hampshire is $49,017, 22.5% above what you earn; on $250,000 it is $270,560, 8.2% above. The relationship bends by 14.3% across that range.
"Nevada" and "New Hampshire" are not places you can compare
Every figure above uses each state's median local property tax rate — its counties in Nevada, its counties in New Hampshire — and that is a simplification the page should own rather than hide.
New Hampshire has 10 counties, and the effective property tax rate runs from 1.06% in Carroll County to 2.38% in Sullivan County — 2.3 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $5,282 a year, without leaving the state.
10 counties. Each dot is one. The spread is 2.3 times from end to end, which is why a state average is not a number you can plan with.
Nevada has 16 counties, and the effective property tax rate runs from 0.4% in Storey County to 0.7% in Mineral County — 1.8 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $1,208 a year, without leaving the state.
So the honest version of this question is not "Nevada or New Hampshire" but which county. Picking the cheapest county in New Hampshire against the dearest county in Nevada swings the property tax line by $1,411 a year; the reverse choice swings it $7,901 the other way. Against a headline difference of $8,761, the county is not a detail — it is most of the decision.
Neither Nevada nor New Hampshire lets its counties levy their own income tax, so that layer is genuinely zero here rather than unmodelled — one of the 1,225 pairs out of 1,275 where it does not apply. It is the reason Nevada and New Hampshire are easier to compare honestly than most neighbours are.
Over 10 years: $87,615
Nobody moves for one year, and almost no comparison prices the decision over the horizon on which it is actually made.
At $8,761 a year of real difference, 10 years in Nevada instead of New Hampshire is worth $87,615 in today's purchasing power — before compounding anything you might invest it in.
The line starts below zero because moving costs about $15,000 and lands entirely in year one. It takes until year 2 for the move to pay for itself. That is the figure a per-year comparison hides.
The first slice of it is not yours, though. Reckoning $15,000 for removal, fees and selling costs — this page's assumption, not a sourced figure — at $8,761 a year it takes 1.7 years to earn back, so a stay shorter than that loses money on a move the annual figure calls a win.
At three horizons: $26,284 over three years, $87,615 over 10, $262,844 over thirty.
None of those figures contains the one variable that could overturn them: the same job rarely pays the same in Nevada and New Hampshire. That is what the $112,977 break-even above is for — it prices an offer instead of assuming the offer is identical.
Where every number here comes from
Four sources, each read off the body that publishes it:
US Bureau of Economic Analysis — Regional Price Parities by State and Metro Area, 2024 (released 19 February 2026) — read 2026-09-08. https://www.bea.gov/data/prices-inflation/regional-price-parities-state-and-metro-area
IRS — Revenue Procedure for the tax year (federal brackets, standard deduction and FICA) — read 2026-09-02. https://www.irs.gov/
Each state's own department of revenue (state income tax rates and deductions), verified one state at a time — read 2026-09-02. https://estimatetax.net/sources/
US Census Bureau, American Community Survey (county effective property tax rates) — read 2026-08-31. https://data.census.gov/
The cost of living index is the part worth checking, because it is where comparison sites usually reach for something crowd-sourced. The Regional Price Parities are produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, cover every state and metro area, and are published with a methodology document. The figures here are the 2024 release and are not extrapolated forward.
And what this page does not model:
— The cost of living index is the BEA's Regional Price Parity for 2024, the most recent published. It is not extrapolated to the current year, and it is a state-wide average — inside a state, a metro area and a rural county differ by more than most state pairs do.
— Moving costs, state transfer taxes on buying a home, and the cost of selling the one you have are not included. On a short stay they can outweigh every annual difference on this page.
— Sales tax is not modelled. It is inside the BEA index — that is what a price parity measures — but it is not broken out separately here.
— The comparison assumes the same salary in both places unless you change it. In practice a job in a high-cost state usually pays more, which is exactly what the break-even figure is for.
— Health insurance, childcare and car insurance vary enormously by state and are only inside the index as averages. If any of the three is a large part of your budget, it deserves its own arithmetic.
Where to go next
Questions
- Is it cheaper to live in Nevada or New Hampshire?
- Nevada, by $8,761 a year in real purchasing power on $100,000 with a $400,000 home. The take-home difference is only $5,889; the rest comes from the cost of living, where Nevada indexes at 100 and New Hampshire at 104.2 against a national average of 100.
- How much do I need to earn in New Hampshire to match $100,000 in Nevada?
- $112,977 — 13.0% more. That accounts for federal tax, FICA, state tax, property tax and the price level in each state.
- What are the taxes in Nevada vs New Hampshire?
- On $100,000: state income tax of $0 in Nevada against $0 in New Hampshire, and property tax of $2,031 against $7,920 on a $400,000 home at median county rates. Federal tax and FICA are identical in both — $13,170 and $7,650 — so any comparison showing a difference there is wrong.
- Does New Hampshire really have lower property tax?
- That depends entirely on the county, which is why a state-level answer is not much use. New Hampshire runs from 1.06% in Carroll County to 2.38% in Sullivan County — 2.3 times, or $5,282 a year on a $400,000 home. The median is 1.98%.
- How much is the difference over 10 years?
- $87,615 in today's purchasing power, at $8,761 a year. That excludes moving and housing transaction costs, which land in year one and can outweigh everything else on a short stay.
- Where does your cost of living data come from?
- The Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities for 2024, an official index covering every state and metro area with a published methodology. Not a crowd-sourced database — and it comes broken into housing, goods, utilities and services, which matters because housing moves several times more than anything else.