estimatetax
2026 · tax + cost of living · property tax by county

Illinois vs Nevada

A tax calculator says the difference is $10,160 a year. Once you count what a dollar actually buys in each, Nevada is $10,160 ahead — $101,600 over 10 years.

Clearly better in Nevada$10,160 a yearWorth 10.2% of your salary a year, every year you stay. This one is not a rounding error.

Property tax is set by counties, not states. Inside Texas alone the rate varies six times over, so this is the single choice that changes the answer most.

Step 1 of 4 · no account, nothing saved

Does it work everywhere in Nevada?

Nevada is ahead by
$10,160 a year

in what the money buys · $101,600 over 10 years

To live the same in Nevada, earn
$85,558

A pay cut of up to $14,442 (14.4%) still leaves you level.

Where each dollar goes in Illinois and NevadaStacked bars. Illinois: Federal + FICA $20,820, State income tax $4,805, Property tax $7,386, take-home $66,989. Nevada: Federal + FICA $20,820, State income tax $0, Property tax $2,031, take-home $77,149.Illinois$66,989 keptNevada$77,149 kept
Federal + FICAState income taxProperty taxTake-home
Pablo Ruiz Quintero, Founder and editor

Pablo Ruiz Quintero

Founder and editor

About me

Who worked this out, and what it is built on

I build and maintain every comparison on this site — 1275 state pairs so far, on the same engine that runs the tax calculators for all 50 states and 3,143 counties. This is not a template with two names swapped into it: Illinois and Nevada are run through the actual rules of each place, and if the numbers say the move is not worth it, that is what the page says.

Four sources, and one deliberate refusal. Federal figures from the IRS revenue procedure. State rates read one state at a time off each state’s own department of revenue. County property tax from the US Census Bureau. Cost of living from the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities, 2024 — and not from Numbeo or any other crowd-sourced index, because those are filled in by users, publish no methodology, and cannot be cited. That single choice is most of why the cost-of-living numbers here differ from everybody else’s.

When I get something wrong I publish the correction with the date and what it cost — including the two mistakes on these pages I found myself. Data last verified September 1, 2026.

Where to go from here

Almost nobody is choosing between exactly two places. These are the questions that usually come next, with the answer already attached so you can see which is worth opening.

Other moves involving Illinois or Nevada

States that sit near Nevada on prices compared against Illinois, and the mirror of that. The comparison you would run next.

Each state on its own

The full detail behind each half of the comparison above.

The counties that decide it

Property tax is set by county, and the spread inside one state beats most state pairs.

Similar in price to Illinois

States that sit next to Illinois on the price index — often the comparison people should have run.

Nevada has no income tax, and against Illinois that is worth only $10,160 — here is where it goes

Nevada does not levy a state income tax. That single fact drives most of the traffic between these two states, and taken alone it implies a saving of $4,805 a year on $100,000 — what Illinois would have taken.

The actual change in take-home is $10,160, because Nevada charges more property tax: $2,031 against $7,386 on a $400,000 home. States without an income tax raise the money somewhere, and the somewhere is usually your house. Then prices move it again — 100 against 100 on the official index — leaving a real difference of $10,160 a year in favour of Nevada, 1.0× the nominal figure.

Where the two sit nationally: Illinois is the 18th most expensive place to live of the 51 — the 50 states and the District of Columbia — and Nevada is 19th. Housing, the component that moves most, is 93.9 against 114.1.

From Illinois to Nevada, step by step
$67kIllinois+$4.8kState income t…+$5.4kProperty taxno changePrice level$77kNevada

Grey columns are what a year of Illinois and a year of Nevada are worth in the same money. The bars between them are each thing that changes, in the order it changes: green adds, amber takes away.

Where the money actually goes, line by line

Five separate taxes, and on this pair property tax is the biggest single difference — $5,355 against $4,805 for the income tax everybody quotes:

Federal income tax — $13,170 either way. Identical, because it is federal. Any comparison that shows a difference here is wrong.

FICA — $7,650 either way. Also federal, also identical.

State income tax — $4,805 in Illinois, $0 in Nevada. Nevada does not levy one at all, which is the fact that sells the move — and, as the next line shows, not the fact that decides it.

Property tax — $7,386 in Illinois, $2,031 in Nevada on a $400,000 home, at each state's median local rate. This is bigger than the income tax difference, and it runs the other way — which is the whole reason the headline number disappoints.

Local income tax — zero on both sides. Nevada has none at any level, state or local — and that holds for all nine states without a state income tax, none of which lets a county or city levy one either. The two go together.

Total: $33,011 in Illinois against $22,851 in Nevada — 33.0% and 22.9% of gross.

And Nevada housing costs 21.5% more

These two states cost almost the same to live in, which is why the tax difference survives into the answer. The index is the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parity — official, published per state, 100 is the national average — and it is worth looking at the components even when the headline barely moves, because they can disagree with it.

Price level, component by component
All items
100100
Housing
93.9114.1
Goods
103.896.3
Utilities
8590.5
Services
100.298.7

Cheaper in Nevada than IllinoisDearer in Nevada than Illinois

Each bar is how far apart Illinois and Nevada are on that component, and which way. Housing almost always runs several times wider than everything else — which is why a single blended index tells you very little.

All items — 100 in Illinois, 100 in Nevada. A gap of 0.0 points.

Housing — 93.9 against 114.1. A gap of 20.2 points, 202.0× the headline gap. This is what people mean when they say somewhere is expensive.

Goods — 103.8 against 96.3, 7.5 points apart — wide for goods: across all 1,275 state pairs the median goods gap is 2.7 points against 24.9 for housing, so on this pair the shopping basket genuinely differs and not just the rent.

Utilities — 85 against 90.5. 5.5 points apart, close enough not to change a decision.

Which half of this reaches you depends on whether you buy. Renting, the real difference between Illinois and Nevada is $4,805 a year — property tax comes out of your side entirely, and what is left is the price level. Buying a $400,000 home it is $10,160. So buying widens the gap by $5,355: the more house you own, the more this comparison is worth to you.

The number to take into a salary negotiation: $85,558

This is the question people are actually asking and almost nobody answers: what would I need to earn in Nevada to live exactly as well as I do on $100,000 in Illinois?

$85,558. That is 14.4% less than you earn now. You could take a pay cut of $14,442 moving to Nevada and be no worse off — which is a very different conversation to have with a recruiter than "Nevada has lower taxes".

What you would need to earn in Nevada, at every salary
Earning $40,000 in Illinois needs $31,052 in NevadaEarning $80,000 in Illinois needs $66,965 in NevadaEarning $130,000 in Illinois needs $113,214 in NevadaEarning $200,000 in Illinois needs $179,299 in Nevada$40k$145k$250k$29k$260ksalary in Illinois

The dashed line is the salary you earn now. The solid line is what matches it in Nevada. If the relationship were a simple multiplier the two would be parallel — they are not, because brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that does not move with income all bend it.

The obvious shortcut fails here, and by a measurable amount. Scaling your salary by the ratio of price levels — $100,000 × 100/100 — gives $100,000. The answer is $85,558, so the shortcut is $14,442 too high: brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that ignores income all bend the line the shortcut assumes is straight.

The figure belongs to the two states and your income. On $40,000 the match in Nevada is $31,052, 22.4% below what you earn; on $250,000 it is $223,214, 10.7% below. The relationship bends by 11.7% across that range.

"Illinois" and "Nevada" are not places you can compare

Every figure above uses each state's median local property tax rate — its counties in Illinois, its counties in Nevada — and that is a simplification the page should own rather than hide.

Nevada has 16 counties, and the effective property tax rate runs from 0.4% in Storey County to 0.7% in Mineral County — 1.8 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $1,208 a year, without leaving the state.

Every county in Illinois, by effective property tax rate
Pulaski County: 0.82%Pope County: 1.02%Hardin County: 1.18%Lawrence County: 1.21%Johnson County: 1.32%Hamilton County: 1.35%Scott County: 1.38%White County: 1.39%Randolph County: 1.40%Union County: 1.41%Edwards County: 1.47%Brown County: 1.47%Wabash County: 1.47%Calhoun County: 1.47%Shelby County: 1.50%Massac County: 1.50%Franklin County: 1.50%Gallatin County: 1.51%Effingham County: 1.51%Fayette County: 1.52%Richland County: 1.52%Wayne County: 1.53%Edgar County: 1.54%Saline County: 1.56%Pike County: 1.56%Crawford County: 1.56%Macoupin County: 1.58%Adams County: 1.58%Putnam County: 1.59%Clay County: 1.62%Menard County: 1.64%Stark County: 1.64%Alexander County: 1.65%Greene County: 1.66%Perry County: 1.66%Henderson County: 1.68%Clark County: 1.68%Christian County: 1.69%Monroe County: 1.70%Marion County: 1.71%Williamson County: 1.71%Jefferson County: 1.71%Montgomery County: 1.72%Jo Daviess County: 1.74%Jersey County: 1.75%Piatt County: 1.76%Cumberland County: 1.76%Vermilion County: 1.79%Douglas County: 1.81%Schuyler County: 1.83%Logan County: 1.84%Washington County: 1.85%De Witt County: 1.85%Clinton County: 1.86%Hancock County: 1.86%Morgan County: 1.88%Warren County: 1.90%Jasper County: 1.90%Moultrie County: 1.91%Jackson County: 1.91%Lee County: 1.92%Madison County: 1.93%Mercer County: 1.95%Knox County: 1.95%Iroquois County: 1.95%Bond County: 1.96%Sangamon County: 1.98%Henry County: 1.98%Cook County: 1.98%Marshall County: 1.99%Grundy County: 2.03%Ogle County: 2.03%Carroll County: 2.03%Coles County: 2.05%Ford County: 2.07%Bureau County: 2.07%Champaign County: 2.07%St. Clair County: 2.09%DuPage County: 2.09%Cass County: 2.10%Macon County: 2.10%Tazewell County: 2.12%Whiteside County: 2.13%Fulton County: 2.13%Mason County: 2.15%LaSalle County: 2.15%McDonough County: 2.16%Woodford County: 2.18%Livingston County: 2.18%Kankakee County: 2.22%Peoria County: 2.24%Boone County: 2.27%McLean County: 2.27%Rock Island County: 2.33%Will County: 2.35%Kane County: 2.39%Stephenson County: 2.46%Winnebago County: 2.48%McHenry County: 2.49%Kendall County: 2.53%DeKalb County: 2.54%Lake County: 2.68%median 1.85%Pulaski County 0.82%Lake County 2.68%

102 counties. Each dot is one. The spread is 3.2 times from end to end, which is why a state average is not a number you can plan with.

Illinois has 102 counties, and the effective property tax rate runs from 0.82% in Pulaski County to 2.68% in Lake County — 3.2 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $7,409 a year, without leaving the state.

So the honest version of this question is not "Illinois or Nevada" but which county. Picking the cheapest county in Nevada against the dearest county in Illinois swings the property tax line by $9,102 a year; the reverse choice swings it $485 the other way. Against a headline difference of $10,160, the county is not a detail — it is most of the decision.

Neither Illinois nor Nevada lets its counties levy their own income tax, so that layer is genuinely zero here rather than unmodelled — one of the 1,225 pairs out of 1,275 where it does not apply. It is the reason Illinois and Nevada are easier to compare honestly than most neighbours are.

Over 10 years: $101,600

Nobody moves for one year, and almost no comparison prices the decision over the horizon on which it is actually made.

At $10,160 a year of real difference, 10 years in Nevada instead of Illinois is worth $101,600 in today's purchasing power — before compounding anything you might invest it in.

Cumulative, with moving costs counted
pays for itself$87kmoveyr 5yr 100

The line starts below zero because moving costs about $15,000 and lands entirely in year one. It takes until year 2 for the move to pay for itself. That is the figure a per-year comparison hides.

The first slice of it is not yours, though. Reckoning $15,000 for removal, fees and selling costs — this page's assumption, not a sourced figure — at $10,160 a year it takes 1.5 years to earn back, so a stay shorter than that loses money on a move the annual figure calls a win.

At three horizons: $30,480 over three years, $101,600 over 10, $304,800 over thirty.

None of those figures contains the one variable that could overturn them: the same job rarely pays the same in Illinois and Nevada. That is what the $85,558 break-even above is for — it prices an offer instead of assuming the offer is identical.

You could take a $14,442 pay cut to move to Nevada and be no worse off

That is the version of this comparison worth taking into a negotiation, and it is not a figure any tax calculator produces.

Matching your $100,000 standard of living in Illinois takes $85,558 in Nevada — 14.4% less than you earn now. So an offer of $85,558 is not a downgrade, and an offer above it is a raise however it looks on paper.

The reverse framing is the one recruiters use, and it is worth being able to answer: a company in Illinois offering to match your current salary is offering you less than the Nevada job at $85,558. On 10 years the difference is $101,600.

Where every number here comes from

Four sources, each read off the body that publishes it:

US Bureau of Economic Analysis — Regional Price Parities by State and Metro Area, 2024 (released 19 February 2026) — read 2026-09-08. https://www.bea.gov/data/prices-inflation/regional-price-parities-state-and-metro-area

IRS — Revenue Procedure for the tax year (federal brackets, standard deduction and FICA) — read 2026-09-02. https://www.irs.gov/

Each state's own department of revenue (state income tax rates and deductions), verified one state at a time — read 2026-09-02. https://estimatetax.net/sources/

US Census Bureau, American Community Survey (county effective property tax rates) — read 2026-08-31. https://data.census.gov/

The cost of living index is the part worth checking, because it is where comparison sites usually reach for something crowd-sourced. The Regional Price Parities are produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, cover every state and metro area, and are published with a methodology document. The figures here are the 2024 release and are not extrapolated forward.

And what this page does not model:

— The cost of living index is the BEA's Regional Price Parity for 2024, the most recent published. It is not extrapolated to the current year, and it is a state-wide average — inside a state, a metro area and a rural county differ by more than most state pairs do.

— Moving costs, state transfer taxes on buying a home, and the cost of selling the one you have are not included. On a short stay they can outweigh every annual difference on this page.

— Sales tax is not modelled. It is inside the BEA index — that is what a price parity measures — but it is not broken out separately here.

— The comparison assumes the same salary in both places unless you change it. In practice a job in a high-cost state usually pays more, which is exactly what the break-even figure is for.

— Health insurance, childcare and car insurance vary enormously by state and are only inside the index as averages. If any of the three is a large part of your budget, it deserves its own arithmetic.

Where to go next

Questions

Is it cheaper to live in Illinois or Nevada?
Nevada, by $10,160 a year in real purchasing power on $100,000 with a $400,000 home. The take-home difference is only $10,160; the rest comes from the cost of living, where Illinois indexes at 100 and Nevada at 100 against a national average of 100.
How much do I need to earn in Nevada to match $100,000 in Illinois?
$85,558 — 14.4% less than you earn now, so a pay cut of up to $14,442 still leaves you level. That accounts for federal tax, FICA, state tax, property tax and the price level in each state.
What are the taxes in Illinois vs Nevada?
On $100,000: state income tax of $4,805 in Illinois against $0 in Nevada, and property tax of $7,386 against $2,031 on a $400,000 home at median county rates. Federal tax and FICA are identical in both — $13,170 and $7,650 — so any comparison showing a difference there is wrong.
Does Nevada really have lower property tax?
That depends entirely on the county, which is why a state-level answer is not much use. Nevada runs from 0.4% in Storey County to 0.7% in Mineral County — 1.8 times, or $1,208 a year on a $400,000 home. The median is 0.51%.
How much is the difference over 10 years?
$101,600 in today's purchasing power, at $10,160 a year. That excludes moving and housing transaction costs, which land in year one and can outweigh everything else on a short stay.
Where does your cost of living data come from?
The Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities for 2024, an official index covering every state and metro area with a published methodology. Not a crowd-sourced database — and it comes broken into housing, goods, utilities and services, which matters because housing moves several times more than anything else.