Alaska vs South Dakota
A tax calculator says the difference is $1,444 a year. Once you count what a dollar actually buys in each, South Dakota is $9,978 ahead — $99,784 over 10 years.
Property tax is set by counties, not states. Inside Texas alone the rate varies six times over, so this is the single choice that changes the answer most.
Does it work everywhere in South Dakota?
in what the money buys · $99,784 over 10 years
A pay cut of up to $12,567 (12.6%) still leaves you level.
Who worked this out, and what it is built on
I build and maintain every comparison on this site — 1275 state pairs so far, on the same engine that runs the tax calculators for all 50 states and 3,143 counties. This is not a template with two names swapped into it: Alaska and South Dakota are run through the actual rules of each place, and if the numbers say the move is not worth it, that is what the page says.
Four sources, and one deliberate refusal. Federal figures from the IRS revenue procedure. State rates read one state at a time off each state’s own department of revenue. County property tax from the US Census Bureau. Cost of living from the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities, 2024 — and not from Numbeo or any other crowd-sourced index, because those are filled in by users, publish no methodology, and cannot be cited. That single choice is most of why the cost-of-living numbers here differ from everybody else’s.
When I get something wrong I publish the correction with the date and what it cost — including the two mistakes on these pages I found myself. Data last verified September 1, 2026.
Where to go from here
Almost nobody is choosing between exactly two places. These are the questions that usually come next, with the answer already attached so you can see which is worth opening.
Other moves involving Alaska or South Dakota
States that sit near South Dakota on prices compared against Alaska, and the mirror of that. The comparison you would run next.
- Alabama vs Alaska— Alabama by $7,823
- Alaska vs Louisiana— Louisiana by $10,362
- Alaska vs North Dakota— North Dakota by $9,483
- Rhode Island vs South Dakota— South Dakota by $15,556
- Colorado vs South Dakota— South Dakota by $12,782
- Florida vs South Dakota— South Dakota by $10,779
Each state on its own
The full detail behind each half of the comparison above.
The counties that decide it
Property tax is set by county, and the spread inside one state beats most state pairs.
- Copper River Census Area, Alaska— 0.08%, the cheapest
- Dillingham Census Area, Alaska— 1.76%, the dearest
- Oglala Lakota County, South Dakota— 0.44%, the cheapest
- Todd County, South Dakota— 2.23%, the dearest
Similar in price to Alaska
States that sit next to Alaska on the price index — often the comparison people should have run.
- Florida— 103.4 on prices
- Oregon— 103.4 on prices
- Colorado— 103.1 on prices
- Rhode Island— 102.3 on prices
- Every Alaska comparison— all 50
- Every South Dakota comparison— all 50
- The nine states with no income tax— and what they charge instead
A tax calculator says Alaska. The right answer is South Dakota, by $9,978 a year
This is one of the 324 state pairs out of 1,275 where the two answers point at different states, and it is worth understanding why before trusting any comparison of these two. On $100,000 with a $400,000 home, Alaska leaves you $1,444 more in take-home. That figure is correct. It is also the wrong basis for the decision.
Because Alaska is the more expensive place to spend it. On the Bureau of Economic Analysis price index Alaska is 102.4 and South Dakota is 88.6, national average 100. Deflate each take-home by where it gets spent and the ranking inverts: $74,525 in Alaska against $84,504 in South Dakota. South Dakota wins by $9,978 a year — the opposite state to the one the tax figure names, and $99,784 over 10 years.
Where the two sit nationally: Alaska is the 14th most expensive place to live of the 51 — the 50 states and the District of Columbia — and South Dakota is 46th. Housing, the component that moves most, is 93.8 against 67.6.
Grey columns are what a year of Alaska and a year of South Dakota are worth in the same money. The bars between them are each thing that changes, in the order it changes: green adds, amber takes away.
Why the two answers disagree, and which one to use
It is worth being precise about what is happening here, because "the cost of living is higher" is the kind of phrase that gets used to wave away an inconvenient number, and this is not that.
Both figures are correct measurements of different things. Take-home answers: how many dollars land in your account? Alaska wins that, by $1,444. Purchasing power answers: how much can those dollars buy where you will be spending them? South Dakota wins that, by $9,978. The second question is the one you are actually asking when you ask where to live.
The mechanism is arithmetic rather than opinion. Divide the Alaska take-home by its price level and you get $74,525; do the same in South Dakota and you get $84,504. The whole reversal comes from a price index of 102.4 against 88.6, published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis for exactly this purpose.
Where the nominal figure is the right one to use: if you are working in one state and spending in another — a border commute, a remote job you will leave, a posting you will not settle in — then your costs do not follow the state you are paid in, and take-home is what matters. That is a real case and it is why both numbers appear on this page rather than only the one that supports the conclusion.
Neither Alaska nor South Dakota taxes income, so nothing here is about income tax
Both of these states levy no state income tax at all, which removes the layer that almost every comparison of two states is built on. The federal bill is $13,170 and FICA $7,650, identical in both because both are federal. State income tax is zero on both sides.
So what is left is the part usually treated as a footnote. Property tax: $2,866 in Alaska against $4,310 in South Dakota on a $400,000 home, at each state's median local rate — a difference of $1,444 a year, and on this pair it is the entire tax story.
And the price level, which is the larger half: 102.4 against 88.6. Between two states with no income tax, the choice is decided almost entirely by property tax and prices — which is a useful thing to know before choosing between them on the strength of a headline they share.
Where the money actually goes, line by line
Before the layers, the conclusion they lead to: on this pair the tax code is a side issue. The price level moves the answer 7.9 times more than the largest single tax difference between Alaska and South Dakota. The five layers still deserve walking, because they are what people arrive believing decides it:
Federal income tax — $13,170 either way. Identical, because it is federal. Any comparison that shows a difference here is wrong.
FICA — $7,650 either way. Also federal, also identical.
State income tax — $0 in Alaska, $0 in South Dakota. Alaska does not levy one at all, which is the fact that sells the move — and, as the next line shows, not the fact that decides it.
Property tax — $2,866 in Alaska, $4,310 in South Dakota on a $400,000 home, at each state's median local rate. This is bigger than the income tax difference, and it runs the other way — which is the whole reason the headline number disappoints.
Local income tax — zero on both sides. Alaska has none at any level, state or local — and that holds for all nine states without a state income tax, none of which lets a county or city levy one either. The two go together.
Total: $23,686 in Alaska against $25,130 in South Dakota — 23.7% and 25.1% of gross.
And Alaska housing costs 38.8% more
Comparison sites use a single crowd-sourced cost-of-living figure. This is the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parity, official and broken into components — and on this pair the components tell a stranger story than the headline, starting with utilities.
Cheaper in South Dakota than AlaskaDearer in South Dakota than Alaska
Each bar is how far apart Alaska and South Dakota are on that component, and which way. Housing almost always runs several times wider than everything else — which is why a single blended index tells you very little.
All items — 102.4 in Alaska, 88.6 in South Dakota. A gap of 13.8 points.
Housing — 93.8 against 67.6. A gap of 26.2 points, 1.9× the headline gap. This is what people mean when they say somewhere is expensive.
Goods — 106.3 against 95.5, 10.8 points apart — wide for goods: across all 1,275 state pairs the median goods gap is 2.7 points against 24.9 for housing, so on this pair the shopping basket genuinely differs and not just the rent.
Utilities — 119 against 79.7. 39.3 points, the second widest component after housing on this pair, and large enough to matter to anyone heating or cooling a big house.
Which half of this reaches you depends on whether you buy. Renting, the real difference between Alaska and South Dakota is $12,044 a year — property tax comes out of your side entirely, and what is left is the price level. Buying a $400,000 home it is $9,978. So renting is where the gap is widest here, by $2,065 — unusual, and it means buying erodes the advantage rather than compounding it.
The number to take into a salary negotiation: $87,433
This is the question people are actually asking and almost nobody answers: what would I need to earn in South Dakota to live exactly as well as I do on $100,000 in Alaska?
$87,433. That is 12.6% less than you earn now. You could take a pay cut of $12,567 moving to South Dakota and be no worse off — which is a very different conversation to have with a recruiter than "South Dakota has lower taxes".
The dashed line is the salary you earn now. The solid line is what matches it in South Dakota. If the relationship were a simple multiplier the two would be parallel — they are not, because brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that does not move with income all bend it.
The obvious shortcut fails here, and by a measurable amount. Scaling your salary by the ratio of price levels — $100,000 × 88.6/102.4 — gives $86,523. The answer is $87,433, so the shortcut is $910 too low: brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that ignores income all bend the line the shortcut assumes is straight.
The figure belongs to the two states and your income. On $40,000 the match in South Dakota is $36,521, 8.7% below what you earn; on $250,000 it is $215,476, 13.8% below. The relationship bends by 5.1% across that range.
"Alaska" and "South Dakota" are not places you can compare
Every figure above uses each state's median local property tax rate — its boroughs and census areas in Alaska, its counties in South Dakota — and that is a simplification the page should own rather than hide.
South Dakota has 65 counties, and the effective property tax rate runs from 0.44% in Oglala Lakota County to 2.23% in Todd County — 5.1 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $7,157 a year, without leaving the state.
26 boroughs and census areas. Each dot is one. The spread is 21.7 times from end to end, which is why a state average is not a number you can plan with.
Alaska has 26 boroughs and census areas, and the effective property tax rate runs from 0.08% in Copper River Census Area to 1.76% in Dillingham Census Area — 21.7 times. On a $400,000 home that is a spread of $6,698 a year, without leaving the state.
So the honest version of this question is not "Alaska or South Dakota" but which borough or census area or county. Picking the cheapest county in South Dakota against the dearest borough or census area in Alaska swings the property tax line by $5,275 a year; the reverse choice swings it $8,580 the other way. Against a headline difference of $9,978, the county is not a detail — it is most of the decision.
Neither Alaska nor South Dakota lets its boroughs and census areas or counties levy their own income tax, so that layer is genuinely zero here rather than unmodelled — one of the 1,225 pairs out of 1,275 where it does not apply. It is the reason Alaska and South Dakota are easier to compare honestly than most neighbours are.
Over 10 years: $99,784
Nobody moves for one year, and almost no comparison prices the decision over the horizon on which it is actually made.
At $9,978 a year of real difference, 10 years in South Dakota instead of Alaska is worth $99,784 in today's purchasing power — before compounding anything you might invest it in.
The line starts below zero because moving costs about $15,000 and lands entirely in year one. It takes until year 2 for the move to pay for itself. That is the figure a per-year comparison hides.
The first slice of it is not yours, though. Reckoning $15,000 for removal, fees and selling costs — this page's assumption, not a sourced figure — at $9,978 a year it takes 1.5 years to earn back, so a stay shorter than that loses money on a move the annual figure calls a win.
At three horizons: $29,935 over three years, $99,784 over 10, $299,353 over thirty.
None of those figures contains the one variable that could overturn them: the same job rarely pays the same in Alaska and South Dakota. That is what the $87,433 break-even above is for — it prices an offer instead of assuming the offer is identical.
You could take a $12,567 pay cut to move to South Dakota and be no worse off
That is the version of this comparison worth taking into a negotiation, and it is not a figure any tax calculator produces.
Matching your $100,000 standard of living in Alaska takes $87,433 in South Dakota — 12.6% less than you earn now. So an offer of $87,433 is not a downgrade, and an offer above it is a raise however it looks on paper.
The reverse framing is the one recruiters use, and it is worth being able to answer: a company in Alaska offering to match your current salary is offering you less than the South Dakota job at $87,433. On 10 years the difference is $99,784.
Where every number here comes from
Four sources, each read off the body that publishes it:
US Bureau of Economic Analysis — Regional Price Parities by State and Metro Area, 2024 (released 19 February 2026) — read 2026-09-08. https://www.bea.gov/data/prices-inflation/regional-price-parities-state-and-metro-area
IRS — Revenue Procedure for the tax year (federal brackets, standard deduction and FICA) — read 2026-09-02. https://www.irs.gov/
Each state's own department of revenue (state income tax rates and deductions), verified one state at a time — read 2026-09-02. https://estimatetax.net/sources/
US Census Bureau, American Community Survey (county effective property tax rates) — read 2026-08-31. https://data.census.gov/
The cost of living index is the part worth checking, because it is where comparison sites usually reach for something crowd-sourced. The Regional Price Parities are produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, cover every state and metro area, and are published with a methodology document. The figures here are the 2024 release and are not extrapolated forward.
And what this page does not model:
— The cost of living index is the BEA's Regional Price Parity for 2024, the most recent published. It is not extrapolated to the current year, and it is a state-wide average — inside a state, a metro area and a rural county differ by more than most state pairs do.
— Moving costs, state transfer taxes on buying a home, and the cost of selling the one you have are not included. On a short stay they can outweigh every annual difference on this page.
— Sales tax is not modelled. It is inside the BEA index — that is what a price parity measures — but it is not broken out separately here.
— The comparison assumes the same salary in both places unless you change it. In practice a job in a high-cost state usually pays more, which is exactly what the break-even figure is for.
— Health insurance, childcare and car insurance vary enormously by state and are only inside the index as averages. If any of the three is a large part of your budget, it deserves its own arithmetic.
Where to go next
Questions
- Is it cheaper to live in Alaska or South Dakota?
- South Dakota, by $9,978 a year in real purchasing power on $100,000 with a $400,000 home. The take-home difference is only $1,444; the rest comes from the cost of living, where Alaska indexes at 102.4 and South Dakota at 88.6 against a national average of 100.
- How much do I need to earn in South Dakota to match $100,000 in Alaska?
- $87,433 — 12.6% less than you earn now, so a pay cut of up to $12,567 still leaves you level. That accounts for federal tax, FICA, state tax, property tax and the price level in each state.
- What are the taxes in Alaska vs South Dakota?
- On $100,000: state income tax of $0 in Alaska against $0 in South Dakota, and property tax of $2,866 against $4,310 on a $400,000 home at median county rates. Federal tax and FICA are identical in both — $13,170 and $7,650 — so any comparison showing a difference there is wrong.
- Does South Dakota really have lower property tax?
- That depends entirely on the county, which is why a state-level answer is not much use. South Dakota runs from 0.44% in Oglala Lakota County to 2.23% in Todd County — 5.1 times, or $7,157 a year on a $400,000 home. The median is 1.08%.
- How much is the difference over 10 years?
- $99,784 in today's purchasing power, at $9,978 a year. That excludes moving and housing transaction costs, which land in year one and can outweigh everything else on a short stay.
- Where does your cost of living data come from?
- The Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities for 2024, an official index covering every state and metro area with a published methodology. Not a crowd-sourced database — and it comes broken into housing, goods, utilities and services, which matters because housing moves several times more than anything else.