Switzerland vs every country
All 26 comparisons out of Switzerland on the same real income, so they can be ranked against each other. 7 leave you more than Switzerland does — the best is Thailand at $13,875 a year — and every figure counts social contributions, not just income tax.
7 of the 26 leave you more than Switzerland does
All 26 comparisons out of Switzerland, resolved on the same $100,000 of real income — which in Switzerland is a salary of CHF 106,554. Same purchasing power before tax on every row, so the ranking is made entirely of what each system takes.
Switzerland leaves $76,477 of it, after income tax and every compulsory contribution. That is 8th of 27, and 23.5% of the gross goes.
| Country | Keeps | Behind the first | Taken | Prices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Thailand | $90,352 | first | 9.6% | 32.3 |
| 2India | $89,256 | −$1,096 | 10.7% | 22.7 |
| 3Hong Kong | $87,804 | −$2,548 | 12.2% | 74 |
| 4Pakistan | $80,410 | −$9,942 | 19.6% | 23.4 |
| 5Philippines | $77,798 | −$12,555 | 22.2% | 35.7 |
| 6Singapore | $77,729 | −$12,623 | 22.3% | 78.3 |
| 7Malaysia | $76,824 | −$13,529 | 23.2% | 33.4 |
| 8Switzerland | $76,477 | −$13,875 | 23.5% | 128.2 |
| 9Malta | $75,636 | −$14,717 | 24.4% | 69 |
| 10South Africa | $74,158 | −$16,194 | 25.8% | 43.3 |
| 11Australia | $73,925 | −$16,427 | 26.1% | 94.8 |
| 12United Kingdom | $73,049 | −$17,303 | 27.0% | 92.4 |
| 13Jamaica | $72,545 | −$17,808 | 27.5% | 61.7 |
| 14Canada | $72,437 | −$17,916 | 27.6% | 90.2 |
| 15Japan | $72,399 | −$17,954 | 27.6% | 69 |
| 16New Zealand | $71,870 | −$18,482 | 28.1% | 89.8 |
| 17Spain | $68,934 | −$21,419 | 31.1% | 68.7 |
| 18France | $68,850 | −$21,503 | 31.2% | 82.8 |
| 19Netherlands | $68,265 | −$22,088 | 31.7% | 86.7 |
| 20Ireland | $66,201 | −$24,151 | 33.8% | 102.1 |
| 21Luxembourg | $65,278 | −$25,075 | 34.7% | 98.6 |
| 22Austria | $65,246 | −$25,106 | 34.8% | 84.8 |
| 23Portugal | $63,994 | −$26,358 | 36.0% | 64.9 |
| 24Sweden | $62,087 | −$28,265 | 37.9% | 90.5 |
| 25Ethiopia | $61,361 | −$28,991 | 38.6% | 22.6 |
| 26Germany | $61,065 | −$29,287 | 38.9% | 81.2 |
| 27Italy | $60,321 | −$30,031 | 39.7% | 72.9 |
The same real income in every row, converted to each currency at the World Bank purchasing power parity factor, taxed under that country’s own system including compulsory contributions, and converted back. “Taken” is everything compulsory as a share of gross; “prices” is the household price level where the United States is 100. This ranks what you keep, not what the tax buys back.
The best on this measure is Thailand, $13,875 a year more; the worst is Italy at $16,156 less. The spread between those two is $30,031 on identical real pay.
And the sentence that has to sit next to the table: this ranks what you keep, not where you would be better off. In some of these countries the tax buys healthcare, university and a pension; in others the household buys them out of the money this table says it kept. There is no dataset that prices that difference, so the ranking does not pretend to.
Every destination from Switzerland, resolved
Each one on its own page, with the full working, the break-even salary and what the figures cannot measure:
Switzerland vs Thailand — +$13,875 a year. Thailand keeps $90,352 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 9.6%; prices index 32.3 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs India — +$12,779 a year. India keeps $89,256 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 10.7%; prices index 22.7 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Hong Kong — +$11,327 a year. Hong Kong keeps $87,804 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 12.2%; prices index 74 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Pakistan — +$3,933 a year. Pakistan keeps $80,410 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 19.6%; prices index 23.4 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs the Philippines — +$1,321 a year. The Philippines keeps $77,798 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 22.2%; prices index 35.7 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Singapore — +$1,252 a year. Singapore keeps $77,729 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 22.3%; prices index 78.3 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Malaysia — +$346 a year. Malaysia keeps $76,824 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 23.2%; prices index 33.4 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Malta — $842 a year less. Malta keeps $75,636 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 24.4%; prices index 69 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs South Africa — $2,319 a year less. South Africa keeps $74,158 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 25.8%; prices index 43.3 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Australia — $2,552 a year less. Australia keeps $73,925 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 26.1%; prices index 94.8 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs the United Kingdom — $3,428 a year less. The United Kingdom keeps $73,049 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 27.0%; prices index 92.4 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Jamaica — $3,932 a year less. Jamaica keeps $72,545 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 27.5%; prices index 61.7 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Canada — $4,040 a year less. Canada keeps $72,437 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 27.6%; prices index 90.2 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Japan — $4,079 a year less. Japan keeps $72,399 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 27.6%; prices index 69 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs New Zealand — $4,607 a year less. New Zealand keeps $71,870 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 28.1%; prices index 89.8 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Spain — $7,543 a year less. Spain keeps $68,934 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 31.1%; prices index 68.7 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs France — $7,628 a year less. France keeps $68,850 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 31.2%; prices index 82.8 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs the Netherlands — $8,213 a year less. The Netherlands keeps $68,265 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 31.7%; prices index 86.7 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Ireland — $10,276 a year less. Ireland keeps $66,201 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 33.8%; prices index 102.1 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Luxembourg — $11,199 a year less. Luxembourg keeps $65,278 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 34.7%; prices index 98.6 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Austria — $11,231 a year less. Austria keeps $65,246 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 34.8%; prices index 84.8 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Portugal — $12,483 a year less. Portugal keeps $63,994 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 36.0%; prices index 64.9 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Sweden — $14,390 a year less. Sweden keeps $62,087 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 37.9%; prices index 90.5 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Ethiopia — $15,116 a year less. Ethiopia keeps $61,361 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 38.6%; prices index 22.6 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Germany — $15,412 a year less. Germany keeps $61,065 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 38.9%; prices index 81.2 against 128.2 here.
Switzerland vs Italy — $16,156 a year less. Italy keeps $60,321 of the same real income, at an effective rate of 39.7%; prices index 72.9 against 128.2 here.
What actually comes out of a Swiss payslip
The figure above is not income tax. It is income tax plus every compulsory contribution, which in most countries is the larger of the two and in a few is more than twice as large.
On CHF 106,554: income tax CHF 2,189 and contributions CHF 22,875 — 2.1% and 21.5% of gross.
The contributions are AHV/IV/EO old age, disability and loss of earnings insurance at CHF 5,647, Unemployment insurance at CHF 1,172, Non-occupational accident insurance at CHF 1,066, Occupational pension, employee share at the statutory minimum for ages 35 to 44 at CHF 3,213, Cantonal and communal income tax, Canton of Zurich and City of Zurich at CHF 11,777.
The tax is charged on steuerbares Einkommen, which on this salary is CHF 92,593 — not the gross. That distinction is where most cross-country comparisons go wrong before any arithmetic starts.
Sources for every one of those figures: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen; Kanton Zürich, Steuergesetz vom 8. Juni 1997 (LS 631.1), § 35 Abs. 1 Grundtarif in the consolidated version in force from 1 April 2026: 0% on the first CHF 7,000, then 2% to 13% in bands, with 13% on income above CHF 266,700; Stadt Zürich; Kanton Zürich. The full citations are at the foot of each comparison page.
What these comparisons do not tell you
What the tax buys. The largest omission and the one worth repeating on every page. Out-of-pocket health spending per person is the one piece of it that exists as a comparable figure — $2,335 in Switzerland, 2023 — and it is one line of several.
Whether the salary exists. Every row holds real income constant, which is the right way to compare tax systems and the wrong way to plan a move. Output per person in Switzerland is $102,513; on some of these rows the other country's figure is very different, and a salary that is ordinary in one is exceptional in the other.
Your household. Every figure is a single filer with no children, on the main regional scale, with no deductions beyond the standard ones. Joint assessment, family quotients and child credits change the answer and in some pairs reverse it.
The year you move. Tax residence rules decide which country taxes you while you are crossing, and a treaty decides it where both claim you. None of that is modelled.
Still not modelled in Switzerland: The cantonal and communal tax is that of the City of Zurich. Every canton sets its own tariff and every commune its own multiplier, and two people on the same salary a few kilometres apart pay materially different tax. The page says which is used.
Still not modelled in Switzerland: The occupational pension contribution is the statutory minimum for ages 35 to 44. The rate rises with age — 7%, 10%, 15% and 18% of the coordinated salary — and many employer plans are more generous than the minimum, in which case the employee contributes more.
Still not modelled in Switzerland: Only the standard professional expenses deduction is applied. The deductions for insurance premiums, pillar 3a savings, travel and meals all reduce taxable income further, so the tax shown is an upper bound.
Still not modelled in Switzerland: Church tax of 10% of the simple tax applies only to registered members of a recognised church and is not included.
How it is worked out
Salaries are converted with the World Bank's purchasing power parity factor for household consumption, not with an exchange rate. An exchange rate measures what money is worth if you carry it abroad; what matters here is what it buys where it is earned.
World Bank, International Comparison Program — PPP conversion factor, household final consumption expenditure (LCU per international $), 2025 — read 2026-09-11. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PA.NUS.PRVT.PP
World Bank — Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor to market exchange rate, 2025 (United States = 100) — read 2026-09-11. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PA.NUS.PPP.03.CD
World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure Database, via World Bank — Out-of-pocket health expenditure per capita, PPP, 2023 — read 2026-09-11. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.OOPC.PP.CD
The price figures are the 2025 release and are not extrapolated. Tax rates and contribution rates come from the authority that sets each one, cited on each page with the date it was read.
Switzerland income tax calculator has the Swiss scale on its own, in detail, including the parts that only matter inside the country.
Where to go next
Questions
- Where would a Swiss salary go furthest?
- Thailand leaves the most — $13,875 a year more than Switzerland on the same real income — and 7 of the 26 countries here leave more than Switzerland does. That is what you keep, not what you get back for it.
- How much of a salary does Switzerland take?
- 23.5% of a CHF 106,554 salary, counting income tax (CHF 2,189) and every compulsory contribution (CHF 22,875). The headline income tax rate on its own describes 2.1% of it.
- Why compare in international dollars?
- Because an exchange rate tells you what your money is worth if you take it somewhere else, and a salary is spent where it is earned. The conversion here is the World Bank's purchasing power parity factor for household consumption, which prices a comparable basket in each country. $100,000 of real income is CHF 106,554 in Switzerland.
- Does this say which country is better to live in?
- No, and it deliberately does not. It measures what a salary leaves you after everything compulsory, in a unit that lets two countries be compared. What the tax buys back — healthcare, education, pensions, unemployment cover — is the other half of the question, and there is no dataset that prices it. Every page here says so rather than quietly picking a winner.