San Francisco vs Stockton
Both are in California, so federal, FICA and state income tax are identical in each: $13,170, $7,650 and $5,055 whichever you choose. The entire difference is property tax and what things cost — $6,052 a year to Stockton, $60,523 over 10 years.
Almost nobody is choosing between exactly two cities. Swap either side for any of the 25 metropolitan areas in California — the income tax stays identical whichever you pick, so what moves is only the price level and the property tax.
Every city in California, against San Francisco
in what the money buys · $60,523 over 10 years · income tax identical in both
A pay cut of up to $10,418 (10.4%) still leaves you level.
San Francisco and Stockton are both in California. Stockton leaves you $6,052 a year better off than San Francisco in what a salary buys.
San Francisco pays more. Stockton is worth $6,052 a year more
Both of these are in California, and that is what makes this comparison clean. Federal income tax, FICA and California state income tax are identical on both sides — $13,170, $7,650 and $5,055 whichever you choose. Nothing about the income tax code separates them, so everything that follows comes from two things only: what a house costs you in property tax, and what everything costs you at the till.
On $100,000 with a $400,000 home, San Francisco leaves you $120 more in take-home — the property tax there is lower. But San Francisco is the more expensive place to spend it: 115.613 against 105.089 on the Bureau of Economic Analysis price index, where 100 is the national average. Deflate each by where it gets spent and the answer inverts.
What the money actually buys: $61,572 in San Francisco against $67,624 in Stockton — a difference of $6,052 a year, and $60,523 over the 10 years most people stay somewhere.
Grey columns are what a year of San Francisco and a year of Stockton are worth in the same money. The bars between them are each thing that changes, in the order it changes: green adds, amber takes away.
This is the level at which the decision is actually made. Nobody moves "to California" — they move to San Francisco or to Stockton, and the 25 metropolitan areas in this state spread 20.4 points on the price index.
The tax bill barely moves. The price of living does
Five layers, and on this pair three of them are identical:
Federal income tax — $13,170 either way. Federal, so it cannot differ.
FICA — $7,650 either way. Also federal.
California state income tax — $5,055 either way. Same state, same brackets, same deduction. This is the layer that carries most state-to-state comparisons, and here it carries nothing.
Local income tax — zero on both sides. California does not let counties or cities levy their own. That is why this pair has a page at all: in the eleven states that do, the local rate is set by jurisdictions that do not line up with metropolitan areas, and we do not publish a figure we would have to invent.
Property tax — $2,940 in San Francisco, $3,059 in Stockton on a $400,000 home. 0.73% against 0.76%, each the average of that area's counties weighted by how many homes are in them. This difference is the whole of the take-home gap, because nothing else in the tax code differs.
And then the price level does the rest: $6,172 a year, more than the property tax difference.
San Francisco housing costs 68.4% more
The index is the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parity, 2024, published for every metropolitan area in the country and broken into components. Not a crowd-sourced database — an official index with a method document, which is most of why these figures differ from other city comparisons.
Cheaper in Stockton than San FranciscoDearer in Stockton than San Francisco
Each bar is how far apart San Francisco and Stockton are on that component, and which way. Housing almost always runs several times wider than everything else — which is why a single blended index tells you very little.
All items — 115.613 in San Francisco, 105.089 in Stockton. 10.5 points apart.
Housing — 194.718 against 115.614. 79.1 points, 7.5× the headline gap. Between two cities in the same state, housing is almost always the entire story: the tax code is identical and the supermarket is close to identical, so what is left is what a roof costs.
Goods — 108.465 against 105.168, 3.3 points apart. Groceries and petrol move very little between cities in one state, which is exactly why a single blended cost-of-living number is close to useless here.
Utilities — 172.585 against 158.247. A wide gap for two places under the same state energy policy — this is climate and grid rather than regulation.
Services — 106.207 against 100.267. Haircuts, restaurants, childcare, repairs.
Neither of these is "California"
Every comparison of two states on this site carries the same admission: the price index it uses is a state-wide average, and inside one state a metropolitan area and a rural county differ by more than most pairs of states do. This page is that admission answered.
California has 25 metropolitan areas. They run from 95.2 to 115.6 on the price index — 20.4 points, inside one state, with one tax code.
One dot per metropolitan area. California runs from 95.2 in El Centro to 115.6 in San Francisco — 20.4 points, and 3 of the 25 sit below the national average even though the state as a whole does not.
San Francisco covers 5 counties and about 4.7 million people; Stockton covers 1 and about 0.8 million. Their property tax rates here are each the average of those counties weighted by how many homes are in them — a house pays the tax, so a county with twice the homes counts twice. A simple average would hand a rural county of a few thousand homes the same weight as an urban one of several hundred thousand.
Renting changes the answer by $368
On this pair the rent-or-buy question matters more than usual, and the reason is structural: property tax is the entire tax difference between these two cities. Take it away and what is left is nothing but the price level.
Renting, the difference is $6,421 a year in favour of Stockton. Buying a $400,000 home it is $6,052 in favour of Stockton. So buying narrows the gap: the property tax runs against the cheaper city here, eating $368 of its advantage.
A renter still pays the property tax, of course — it is inside the rent — but not as a separate bill tied to a value they chose, and the housing price index (194.718 against 115.614) is what captures it for them. The figure above is for someone comparing two mortgages, not two leases.
Change the home value in the calculator above and this whole page moves with it. On a pair like this, where property tax is the only tax that differs, the house you are picturing changes the answer more than your salary does.
The property tax bill, house by house
Property tax is the only tax that separates these two cities, and it scales with the house — so the single number at the top of this page is really a line, not a point. At 0.73% in San Francisco and 0.76% in Stockton:
A $200,000 home — $1,470 a year in San Francisco, $1,530 in Stockton, a gap of $60. Overall: Stockton by $6,236 a year.
A $300,000 home — $2,205 a year in San Francisco, $2,294 in Stockton, a gap of $90. Overall: Stockton by $6,144 a year.
A $400,000 home — $2,940 a year in San Francisco, $3,059 in Stockton, a gap of $120. Overall: Stockton by $6,052 a year.
A $600,000 home — $4,409 a year in San Francisco, $4,589 in Stockton, a gap of $179. Overall: Stockton by $5,868 a year.
A $800,000 home — $5,879 a year in San Francisco, $6,118 in Stockton, a gap of $239. Overall: Stockton by $5,684 a year.
The answer holds across that whole range: Stockton at every house value from $200,000 to $800,000. It is $553 wider at the top of it than at the bottom.
Two caveats this arithmetic does not carry. The first is that the rate used is the effective rate — tax actually paid over market value, across the counties of each area, so it already absorbs assessment ratios and the ordinary homestead exemptions rather than pretending they do not exist. The second is that it is an average of counties, and inside a metropolitan area a school district can move a bill by a good deal more than the difference between these two cities. Your address decides that, and this page cannot see your address.
Who this changes for, and by how much
Because both cities are in California, filing status and household size cannot change which city comes out ahead through the tax code — the same brackets apply on both sides. What they change is the size of the gap, and they change it in a direction most people get backwards: the more you take home, the more the price difference costs you, because the price level applies to everything you spend.
A single filer on $60,000 — Stockton by $3,854 a year. Take-home $45,811 in San Francisco, $45,691 in Stockton.
A single filer on $100,000 — Stockton by $6,052 a year. Take-home $71,185 in San Francisco, $71,066 in Stockton.
A couple filing jointly on $100,000 — Stockton by $6,577 a year. Take-home $77,246 in San Francisco, $77,126 in Stockton.
A couple filing jointly on $160,000 — Stockton by $10,036 a year. Take-home $117,176 in San Francisco, $117,056 in Stockton.
A single filer on $250,000 — Stockton by $13,853 a year. Take-home $161,237 in San Francisco, $161,118 in Stockton.
The couple on $100,000 and the single filer on $100,000 pay different federal tax — the joint standard deduction and wider brackets see to that — but they pay it identically in both cities, so the difference between the two columns is untouched by it. What moves the gap is the larger amount left over to spend at San Francisco prices or Stockton prices.
The practical reading: the higher your income, the more a city with a lower price level is worth to you in dollars, and the less a property tax difference matters as a share of it. On a $60,000 salary the property tax on a $400,000 home is a much larger slice of what you have; on $250,000 it is close to noise. The calculator at the top of this page runs your own figures through the same engine.
Nationally, San Francisco is 1st of 380 and Stockton is 29th
It helps to know whether you are choosing between two expensive places or two cheap ones, because the same dollar gap means different things at different levels.
Of the 380 US metropolitan areas the Bureau of Economic Analysis publishes a price index for, San Francisco ranks 1st at 115.613 and Stockton ranks 29th at 105.089, counting from the most expensive. At least one of them is in the most expensive tenth of the country.
For scale: the national range runs from 83.597 in Monroe to 115.613 in San Francisco. The gap between San Francisco and Stockton is 10.5 points, which is 32.9% of that whole national spread — inside one state.
Purchasing power on $100,000: $61,572 in San Francisco, $67,624 in Stockton.
$6,052 is a wide gap for two cities in one state
A dollar figure on its own is hard to judge, so this site resolved all 1,522 pairs of metropolitan areas that share a state on the same salary and the same house, and this page can therefore say where its own pair falls rather than leaving you to guess.
The median pair differs by $3,385 a year. San Francisco against Stockton differs by $6,052, which puts it at about the 78th percentile — wider than three quarters of them. Two cities under one tax code, and the difference in what a salary buys is larger than in most pairs of cities anywhere in the country.
For the two ends of the scale: the widest within-state pair in the country differs by $22,551 a year and the narrowest by $7. The whole distribution is built with the income tax held constant, which is what makes it comparable — every one of these 1,522 numbers is prices and property tax and nothing else.
It is the same measurement discipline as the rest of the site: the number published is the one that came out of the engine over the whole set, not an impression of it. How the method works, including what it does not claim.
What you would need to earn in Stockton: $89,582
The question behind most of these searches is not "which is cheaper". It is "I have an offer in Stockton — is it enough?"
$89,582 matches what $100,000 buys you in San Francisco. That is 10.4% less than you earn now, so you could take a cut of $10,418 and be no worse off.
The dashed line is the salary you earn now. The solid line is what matches it in Stockton. If the relationship were a simple multiplier the two would be parallel — they are not, because brackets, the Social Security ceiling and a property tax that does not move with income all bend it.
Between two cities in one state this figure is unusually trustworthy, because the tax side of it cancels: no bracket differences, no state deduction differences, nothing to argue about. What is left is arithmetic on prices and property tax.
Over 10 years: $60,523
At $6,052 a year, 10 years in Stockton instead of San Francisco is worth $60,523 in today's purchasing power.
A move between two cities in the same state is the cheapest kind — no change of tax residence, no new state filing, often no change of employer. Reckon $15,000 for removal and the costs of buying and selling, which is this page's assumption rather than a sourced figure, and at this rate it takes 2.5 years to earn back.
The line starts below zero because moving costs about $15,000 and lands entirely in year one. It takes until year 3 for the move to pay for itself. That is the figure a per-year comparison hides.
At three horizons: $18,157 over three years, $60,523 over 10, $181,568 over thirty.
And the limit worth stating: this is a measure of what a salary buys, not of which city is a better place to live. Schools, commute, weather and how far you are from your family are not in it, and on a move within one state they are usually what actually decides it.
The other California comparisons people run next
Almost nobody is choosing between exactly two cities. These are the other California pairs involving San Francisco or Stockton, resolved on the same salary and the same house so they can be read against each other:
Los Angeles vs San Francisco — Los Angeles by $1,277 a year. Los Angeles indexes at 113.566 on prices with property tax at 0.69%.
Riverside vs San Francisco — Riverside by $5,184 a year. Riverside indexes at 106.442 on prices with property tax at 0.77%.
San Diego vs San Francisco — San Diego by $2,175 a year. San Diego indexes at 111.887 on prices with property tax at 0.70%.
Sacramento vs San Francisco — Sacramento by $5,034 a year. Sacramento indexes at 106.67 on prices with property tax at 0.77%.
San Francisco vs San Jose — San Jose by $2,987 a year. San Jose indexes at 110.423 on prices with property tax at 0.71%.
Fresno vs San Francisco — Fresno by $8,090 a year. Fresno indexes at 102.158 on prices with property tax at 0.74%.
Bakersfield vs San Francisco — Bakersfield by $8,286 a year. Bakersfield indexes at 100.886 on prices with property tax at 0.91%.
Oxnard vs San Francisco — Oxnard by $2,980 a year. Oxnard indexes at 110.534 on prices with property tax at 0.69%.
Or start from the whole state: every California city comparison, with all 25 of its metropolitan areas ranked.
Where every number here comes from
Three sources, each read off the body that publishes it:
US Bureau of Economic Analysis — Regional Price Parities by State and Metro Area, 2024 (released 19 February 2026) — read 2026-09-10. https://www.bea.gov/data/prices-inflation/regional-price-parities-state-and-metro-area
US Census Bureau — Core Based Statistical Areas delineation file, 2023 (which counties form each metropolitan area) — read 2026-09-10. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/time-series/demo/metro-micro/delineation-files.html
US Census Bureau, American Community Survey — county effective property tax rates and housing units — read 2026-08-31. https://data.census.gov/
IRS revenue procedure for the federal brackets and FICA, and California's own department of revenue for the state rates — both identical on the two sides of this page, which is the point.
How the three fit together, because joining them is where this kind of page usually breaks:
— The metropolitan area price index and the counties that form each area are published by two different agencies, and joined here by CBSA code rather than by name — there are thirty "Washington County" in the United States and a join on names would have produced silent errors.
— A metropolitan area's property tax rate is the housing-unit-weighted average of its counties. Property tax is paid by a house, so a county with twice the homes counts twice; a simple average would give a rural county of 4,000 homes the same weight as an urban one of 800,000.
— Where a metropolitan area crosses a state line — 43 of the 380 do — the state income tax is computed on the state holding most of its housing, and the page says which state that is and what share sits outside it.
And what this page does not model:
— The cost of living index is the BEA's Regional Price Parity for 2024, the most recent published. It is not extrapolated to the current year, and it is a state-wide average — inside a state, a metro area and a rural county differ by more than most state pairs do.
— Moving costs, state transfer taxes on buying a home, and the cost of selling the one you have are not included. On a short stay they can outweigh every annual difference on this page.
— Sales tax is not modelled. It is inside the BEA index — that is what a price parity measures — but it is not broken out separately here.
— The comparison assumes the same salary in both places unless you change it. In practice a job in a high-cost state usually pays more, which is exactly what the break-even figure is for.
— Health insurance, childcare and car insurance vary enormously by state and are only inside the index as averages. If any of the three is a large part of your budget, it deserves its own arithmetic.
Where to go next
Questions
- Is it cheaper to live in San Francisco or Stockton?
- Stockton, by $6,052 a year in what the money buys, on $100,000 with a $400,000 home. Both are in California, so federal, FICA and state income tax are identical either way — the entire difference is property tax ($2,940 against $3,059) and the price level (115.613 against 105.089, where 100 is the national average).
- How much do I need to earn in Stockton to match $100,000 in San Francisco?
- $89,582 — 10.4% less than you earn now, so a cut of up to $10,418 still leaves you level. Because both cities are in California, the tax side of that figure cancels out and what remains is prices and property tax.
- Do San Francisco and Stockton pay different income tax?
- No. Both are in California: federal income tax is $13,170, FICA $7,650 and state income tax $5,055 on either side of the comparison. California also does not let counties or cities levy their own income tax, so that layer is genuinely zero rather than unmodelled. The only tax that differs is property tax.
- Which has higher property tax, San Francisco or Stockton?
- Stockton, at 0.76% against 0.73% — $120 a year on a $400,000 home. Each rate is the average of that area's counties weighted by how many homes are in them, from US Census Bureau data.
- Is the cost of living really that different inside one state?
- Yes, and that is the reason these pages exist. California's 25 metropolitan areas run from 95.2 to 115.6 on the Bureau of Economic Analysis price index — 20.4 points under a single tax code. A state-level comparison averages that away.
- Does it matter whether I rent or buy?
- More than usual on this pair, because property tax is the only tax that differs between these two cities. Renting — no property tax bill at all — the gap is $6,421 a year in favour of Stockton. Buying a $400,000 home it is $6,052 in favour of Stockton. A renter still pays the tax inside the rent; what changes is that it is no longer tied to a value you chose.
- Does being married change which city is better?
- Not through the tax code — both cities are in California, so filing jointly changes your federal bill identically on either side. It changes the size of the gap, not its direction: a couple filing jointly on $100,000 sees $6,577 a year, against $6,052 for a single filer on the same salary, because the price level applies to whatever is left after tax.
- Where does your cost of living data come from?
- The Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities for 2024, published for every US metropolitan area with a documented method, and broken into housing, goods, utilities and services. Not a crowd-sourced database — which is the single choice that most separates these figures from other city comparisons.